Linked by David Adams on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:37 UTC, submitted by rhyder
Thread beginning with comment 499899
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Yes, it's a problem.
by Kivada on Mon 12th Dec 2011 04:29
in reply to "RE[4]: Yes, it's a problem."
Apparently you haven't tried anything with an i810 series GPU recently, you lose allot more then 3d, you lose support for Xv and XvMC as well as I at least can't get the resolution to go past 960x529 on anything other then the, albeit crash happy i810 driver.
I'd love to be able to use it as would many many others since it was the ubiquitous IGP of the P4 series machines that can be found EVERYWHERE and was for sale on new machines as late as 2006 if I remember. But nobody, least of all Intel is willing to maintain the driver. But then they've also opted to keep the graphics stack fractured by refusing to port to Gallium3D.




Member since:
2005-07-06
In fact you can take it further: the main reason the 3D support for those chips is being dropped is simply that it's pretty much useless; they're just not powerful enough to do much *practical* in the present day. You can't play modern games on them, and making them capable of running Shell or Unity is more work than anyone wants to take on.
So given that the 3D code for those chips isn't really of much practical use to anyone, dropping it makes sense. But the same rationale does not apply to the 2D drivers for those chips.