Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Jan 2012 17:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 502464
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Mobile Browsers
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sat 7th Jan 2012 17:32
in reply to "RE[3]: Mobile Browsers"
It has "Android" as its user agent. It shouldn't be that diffucult to detect if you want to.
Of course, Thom, David and Co, don't get me wrong I get that you're all short on time and money and I appreciate the fact that you are able to provide the service as it is. But, it really isn't detecting Android browsers correctly. If you have the time, energy and resources to fix it great! If not, no worries. I'm more than happy to use it as is.
Just don't take the stats too seriously to make an inference as to the popularity of mobile devices.
RE[4]: Mobile Browsers
by lucas_maximus on Sat 7th Jan 2012 18:59
in reply to "RE[3]: Mobile Browsers"




Member since:
2006-01-25
Android devices are notoriously hard to detect correctly. Some include the "mobile" identifier and some don't (although it is getting much better as most new ones identify as "Mobile Safari" compatible). I expect what is happening is your browser's UA string does include the mobile flag, but for some reason is not being parsed as an Android device (and thus gets the mobile site by default). I would check to see what your User Agent string actually is:
http://whatsmyuseragent.com/