Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Jan 2012 09:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504744
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The title of this article is "Android's Share of Tablet Market Jumps" so in that context, yes it matters greatly. If ultimately the Kindle Fire isn't an Android tablet then likely Android's market share didn't jump very much if at all.
It still runs Android software. So yes, it matters in so far as it is included.
It still runs Android software. So yes, it matters in so far as it is included.
As I said in another post, go to the Kindle Fire page and find where it says it's running Android. If the manufacturer of the device doesn't say it's running Android, and it certainly doesn't pass Google's definition of a device that can call itself an Android device, how is it an Android device? Why should Google get the market share credit, why isn't the Fire split out into a different category when clearly Amazon means to differentiate it?





Member since:
2005-07-06
The title of this article is "Android's Share of Tablet Market Jumps" so in that context, yes it matters greatly. If ultimately the Kindle Fire isn't an Android tablet then likely Android's market share didn't jump very much if at all.