Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Apr 2012 22:22 UTC
Google Interesting, if not inherently flawed, article by Farhad Manjoo. "Honan might be right that Google has violated its own definition of evil, but doesn't it matter that every one of its rivals also routinely violates Google's definition of evil?" I say flawed, because I value promises more than anything. Google has done things recently that break their initial promise. That sucks - there's no way around it. I do love Gruber's take, though: "It's not that Google is evil. It's that they're hypocrites. That's the difference between Google and its competitors." In other words, it's perfectly fine to be an evil scumbag company, as long as you're not claiming you're not. That's a rather... Warped view on morality.
Thread beginning with comment 512904
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Boom
by Soulbender on Thu 5th Apr 2012 05:14 UTC
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

"It's not that Google is evil. It's that they're hypocrites. That's the difference between Google and its competitors."


The irony, it's simply too much. It might cause the universe to implode.

Reply Score: 5