To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, I am well aware how Microsoft plays the game. I am an OpenGL coder, amongst other things, and I remember when Microsoft purposely crippled their own OpenGL implementation so they could redirect people to their recently acquired Direct3D as an alternative. It took SGI and John Carmack (from Id software, makers of Wolfensteiin, Quake, Doom, etc.) to show OpenGL was fine on Windows platform.
Sadly, too many people have an over-reliance on the Windows platform because of the "drone" mentality, they think "everybody" uses it and so they must use it. This probably comes from the stance that the computer is just a "boring white box" and so they blindly accept the status quo. OTOH, there are the more creative/brave/logical people who realise that the Windows platform is not the be-all-end-all and embrace other platforms because of what they offer (e.g. MacOSX, Linux, OpenSolaris/OpenIndiana, OpenBSD ...).




Member since:
2010-07-07
Microsoft's contributions where a red herring and Thom knew it. Every single line of their contributions where to support virtualization of Windows on Linux hosts, just so they could keep selling Windows to managers that know nothing else even exists.
As to Microsoft's ubiquity, you really should look into the history, they did things the mafia wishes they would have thought of to get their position.