Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd May 2012 18:25 UTC
Legal We've got some really good news for all of you: the jury verdict in the patent phase of the Oracle v. Google trial is in, and it's a unanimous one: no patent infringement. This means that the most Oracle could possibly get out of this is a few hundred thousand dollars if (and that's a very big if) judge Alsup rules that APIs are copyrightable. Oracle pretty much lost everything. Permit me to say, in your face, Ellison.
Thread beginning with comment 519184
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
YEAH ! suck it Ellison
by bowkota on Wed 23rd May 2012 21:32 UTC
bowkota
Member since:
2011-10-12

Views on software didn't appear to be the only influencing factor in play either, with Thompson suggesting that "a couple of jurors admired the younger attorney on the Google side" — Daniel Purcell — "maybe not only because he seemed to be a good attorney, but for other reasons."


http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/23/3039284/oracle-google-jury-deadlo...

/facepalm

I don't know what's more stupid. Software patents or having a jury trial on something intricate as this?

Edited 2012-05-23 21:33 UTC

Reply Score: 1

RE: YEAH ! suck it Ellison
by JAlexoid on Thu 24th May 2012 00:12 in reply to "YEAH ! suck it Ellison"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

I find it funny, that the whole legal process can be described as a lawyer popularity battle, rather than logical evidence analysis.

Reply Parent Score: 4