Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520880
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: How to fix a Windows 8 computer...
by Nelson on Tue 5th Jun 2012 16:59
in reply to "RE[5]: How to fix a Windows 8 computer..."
RE[7]: How to fix a Windows 8 computer...
by Neolander on Tue 5th Jun 2012 17:07
in reply to "RE[6]: How to fix a Windows 8 computer..."
Was the Fedora thing for x86? That's unfortunate.
It was. They are against it on ARM for now.
Personally, Secure Boot is something I find stupid on non appliance devices (Laptops, Desktops).
I don't find it stupid, in principle, to sign OS binaries so as to detect if they are altered on boot. My main gripe with Secure Boot is that right now, it is by design a barely disguised method of bootloader locking, rather than the security-oriented feature it claims to be.
Edited 2012-06-05 17:14 UTC




Member since:
2010-03-08
Okay, you win that one. Good eyes !
(Though this still negates the potential averse effects of Secure Boot even on x86. where it is not an absolute ban on other OSs but still a major annoyance in their way. Fedora did end up going as low as paying Microsoft for a reason...)