Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 16th Jun 2012 17:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 522389
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: KDE 4.0 WAS NOT 1.0 IT WAS 0,95 == BETA FOR DEVELOPERS.
by Ultimatebadass on Sat 16th Jun 2012 22:26
in reply to "KDE 4.0 WAS NOT 1.0 IT WAS 0,95 == BETA FOR DEVELOPERS."
RE[2]: KDE 4.0 WAS NOT 1.0 IT WAS 0,95 == BETA FOR DEVELOPERS.
by 1c3d0g on Sat 16th Jun 2012 23:07
in reply to "RE: KDE 4.0 WAS NOT 1.0 IT WAS 0,95 == BETA FOR DEVELOPERS."
Why are we regurgitating the same old sh!t again? If you didn't notice, KDE is quite mature and stable now. I don't see anyone moaning about OS X 10.0 today. That's because everyone moved on to what's currently available.
Living in the past instead of using what's available now gets us nowhere in this discussion.





Member since:
2010-06-01
Somehow the message that KDE 4.0 is for 3rd party devs (so they can port their apps to KDE4) never got into the news headlines.