Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2012 08:50 UTC
Microsoft The New York Times further fans the flames of the emerging uneasiness between Microsoft and its hardware partners. As the paper reports, Microsoft decided it needed to get into the hardware game (with Surface) after the utter failure of HP's Slate 500 Windows 7 tablet. "Microsoft worked with other hardware partners to devise products that would be competitive with the iPad, but it ran into disagreements over designs and prices. 'Faith had been lost' at Microsoft in its hardware partners, including by Steven Sinofsky, the powerful president of Microsoft's Windows division, according to [a] former Microsoft executive." The biggest news is not Surface itself. It's the changing industry it represents. Microsoft failed to deliver capable smartphone/tablet software, which pissed off OEMs, who, in turn, turned to Android (and webOS for HP) - which in turn pissed off Microsoft, leading to Surface. Had Microsoft gotten its act together sooner, we'd have had far better OEM products.
Thread beginning with comment 524020
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Microsoft's fault?
by zima on Wed 27th Jun 2012 18:47 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Microsoft's fault?"
Member since:

Elop brought, and continues to bring, pretty much what Nokia board wanted... (whatever that is, long-term)

That did include an expertise of sorts with one business relation, BTW. And Nokia was visibly stumbling before Elop. And Elop seems to aggressively push further the development of S30 and S40.

Reply Parent Score: 2