Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jul 2012 12:59 UTC
Legal While our beloved readers from the United States celebrate their independence (have a good one, guys and girls), the European Parliament has just voted against ACTA with an absolutely overwhelming majority: 478 against ACTA, 39 in favour (and 165 abstentions). I'm raising a coffee to this one, kids.
Thread beginning with comment 525194
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Hold the fireworks...
by B. Janssen on Wed 4th Jul 2012 17:29 UTC in reply to "RE: Hold the fireworks..."
B. Janssen
Member since:
2006-10-11

I don't get it. If the commissioner can ignore parliament's decision, what purpose does the parliament serve?


I guess my short blurb was misleading. What De Gucht meant was that he will start a new attempt to get ACTA (modified or not) ratified after the European Court decided on the compatibility of ACTA with the EU body of law, whatever the parliament decides now. That's within the law and not very different from what is happening in normal national legislation. OK, normally failed laws are dropped or sneaked in as a hidden addendum to some other legislation. De Gucht chose to be more defiant or maybe ACTA is just too big to ride on the undercard.

To explain the EU setup post-Lisboa would be a little much at this point, but here is a very short version: the commission is roughly the executive branch while the parliament is the legislative branch. To create a law the commission must suggest it and the parliament must confirm it. De Gucht is one of 27 commissioners (1 commissioner per EU member). The commission is assembled by the 1st commisioner, currently Barroso, and confirmed by the parliament. One term is 4 years and the current term ends 2014. Once assembled, only the 1st commisioner can dismss another commissioner. So to get rid if De Gucht pester Barroso. You can contact him over his website: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/president/index_en.htm

Edited 2012-07-04 17:30 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

cyrilleberger Member since:
2006-02-01

Once assembled, only the 1st commisioner can dismss another commissioner. So to get rid if De Gucht pester Barroso.

Yeah, sure, because Barroso the ultra-liberal, ultra-atlantist guy is going to rmemove De Gucht over ACTA ?

Reply Parent Score: 2

B. Janssen Member since:
2006-10-11

"Once assembled, only the 1st commisioner can dismss another commissioner. So to get rid if De Gucht pester Barroso.

Yeah, sure, because Barroso the ultra-liberal, ultra-atlantist guy is going to rmemove De Gucht over ACTA ?
"

I didn't say it would work, but that's one of two ways how you can get rid of a commissioner. The other is to fully replace the *whole* commission through a vote of no confidence by the parliament. Sounds more likely? Didn't think so.

Reply Parent Score: 3

Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

What's an ultra-atlantist? Someone who wants to find Atantis?

Reply Parent Score: 3