Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jul 2012 23:08 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525246
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If the system is broken, a responsible company should do whatever is legal in order to best succeed. And if they don't, shareholders should fire the board.
To suggest I'm naive tells me what sort of idealistic viewpoint you're coming from. No further debate necessary.
To suggest I'm naive tells me what sort of idealistic viewpoint you're coming from. No further debate necessary.
Except your suggested course of action IS naive.
The system is broken because these "responsible" companies have a broken culture. THEY are the system.
If the system is broken, a responsible company should do whatever is legal in order to best succeed. And if they don't, shareholders should fire the board.
To suggest I'm naive tells me what sort of idealistic viewpoint you're coming from. No further debate necessary.
To suggest I'm naive tells me what sort of idealistic viewpoint you're coming from. No further debate necessary.
You're surely not naive. Cynical seems more adequate.
Too bad, most human History big steps were due to idealistic utopists, because only fool can believe they could change the world, right - Thus, only fools actually tries.




Member since:
2005-04-01
If the system is broken, a responsible company should do whatever is legal in order to best succeed. And if they don't, shareholders should fire the board.
To suggest I'm naive tells me what sort of idealistic viewpoint you're coming from. No further debate necessary.