Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jul 2012 16:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526658
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
His data is skewed. For example, he recently dissed Nokia for selling off Nokia Money which he claimed controlled 12% of the market and had 1.2 million subscribers.
Well, if you look at the actual data, Nokia only had 200k subscribers. A far cry from his original claim. Of course anyone who pointed this out was banned.
Or when he claimed Lumia in China was dead because China Mobile had 6% of then Chinese market, or 63M subscribers , when in reality it was 146M making them the largest CDMA provider in the world.
In fact, he also criticizes Nokia for NOT going with Verizon in the US despite Verizon has less subscribers (111 million)
Or writing a scathing blog post dissing Nokia for selling their mobile ad unit when in fact they just sold their media ad unit.
He is severely misleading.