Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Jul 2012 01:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526978
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The latin alphabet is largely unchanged, at least in regard to capital letters (or bookstaves).
But not for several millennia ...well, OK, there is some ambiguity of meaning with that word, but it usually tends to mean more than 2 or 3 (with "few" used more for smaller amounts). Making Latin borderline, at best (plus still unusual, with relative longevity; NVM largely incomprehensible past ~font styles that I mentioned)
Edited 2012-07-19 00:02 UTC




Member since:
2005-10-02
Heeey... we still have the runes. And it is not an alphabet. It is a fuþark (kewl, ALT GR + t works for thorn). Alphabet is that silly thing the monks brought with 'em.
The latin alphabet is largely unchanged, at least in regard to capital letters (or bookstaves).