Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
In the News Okay, so this is entirely new to me. Sparrow is was an email client for Mac OS X and iOS (and Windows), which brought a decent Gmail experience to these platforms - as opposed to Apple's own not-so-good Gmail support and Google's Gmail iOS application which, well, is just a webpage. Google has now acquired Sparrow, and basically all hell has broken loose, to the point of Rian van der Merwe writing that 'we' lost "faith in a philosophy that we thought was a sustainable way to ensure a healthy future for independent software development, where most innovation happens".
Thread beginning with comment 527930
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Comment by marcp
by lucas_maximus on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 21:09 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by marcp"
Member since:

I think Wordpress is by far and away the best by miles, I would put it above most other offers (even .NET, though I hate PHP).

But lets face it most open source software is for development of some sort.

I know there are big projects like Firefox etc etc that aren't geared towards that, but tbh ... even Firefox is now more of a "developers browser" in my mind now. I use Chrome at home.

I was recently speaking to one of our Oracle DBAs and he admits there is a different mindset between *nix and Windows people.

It is a difference in culture and putting it into ideals just isn't helpful IMHO, one should refrain from this.

Edited 2012-07-23 21:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: Comment by marcp
by marcp on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 21:57 in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by marcp"
marcp Member since:

You know, it's not really about the fact that open source is thought about as the developer's tool. It's just one of possible mindsets. Others use it everyday as a final product, not just a minefield for testing new stuff before releasing it into the public as a close-sourced, binary product with branding.

Other thing is that there are really fundamental differences between open and free software. I was actually talking more about free, not open source software [or that's what I've been thinking of], while some of you may only think of it as an open source software. That brings a great deal of misunderstanding. Free software is usually being treated as the final product by the creators, open source may be just a minefield to others.

I think it underlines the problem pretty well.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: Comment by marcp
by lucas_maximus on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 22:31 in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by marcp"
lucas_maximus Member since:

Splitting hairs comes to mind for me.

Reply Parent Score: 2