Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 20:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528008
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Seriously, can any useless hack write for traditional media these days? I mean, come on. If you guys want to be relevant at least try to hire competent writers.
There's so much wrong with this article it's not even funny and there's much I could write but the Ars article is pretty much spot on.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/wsj-mangles-history-to-a...
Still, "Full credit goers to Xerox".
...bitch, *please*.
Executives at Xerox headquarters in Rochester, N.Y., were focused on selling copiers.
So, uh, it's somehow the governments fault that the Xerox executives didn't focus on Ethernet and advancing the Internet?
I'm sure many "dropped the ball" here in a way but putting it all on the government is a bit narrow-minded. It's not like the government was stopping Xerox (or anyone else) from trying to do anything with the internet and Ethernet.
The fact that it didn't take off until it was privatized doesn't mean the government didn't invent it. Inventing and making popular are two different things.
I'm with Vanders; reading this article made me stupider.