Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jul 2012 19:38 UTC, submitted by tupp
Thread beginning with comment 528988
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Sony eh. Very interesting read.
by Lennie on Wed 1st Aug 2012 09:05
in reply to "RE[2]: Sony eh. Very interesting read."
I can see why a company like Sony would get into the content business.
It's an often repeated mantra. It isn't the internet providers or the owners of the glassfibre in the ground that get rich. It's the content creators. "infrastructure" isn't where the money is.
So Sony wanted to be in the content business, instead of only creating the "underlying infrastructure".




Member since:
2009-02-02
Sony always worked better from day one, looked better, and lasted longer than anything else.
DING DING DING DING! We have a winner.
^^Bonus points^^
This hit the nail square on the head. Once Sony got into the content business their fate was sealed. The proprietary formats were relentless and now Sony and the RIAA are so joined at the hip that I no longer purchase or recommend their products to anyone.