Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Aug 2012 20:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Drumhellar on Tue 28th Aug 2012 23:58
in reply to "RE: Comment by Drumhellar"
Steam might, but Quake 3 didn't, nor did the other major games released for Linux via retail in the same time frame, and during that time frame there were several.
Granted, Linux is much, much more polished now, but even then Linux has to do something significant and obvious to set itself apart.
RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Lennie on Wed 29th Aug 2012 00:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar"
Was just typing this comment:
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?532846
If you watch the video I think Mark show they do tries to set themselves apart.
Edited 2012-08-29 00:32 UTC




Member since:
2005-11-13
[qAll joking aside, these articles always manage to ignore Apple's stuff, which already has a significant mindshare, even among Windows users. Macs are also competitively priced if you pick one up towards the beginning of their product cycle, which many of their systems are at. [/q]
Yeah, I think anybody who doesn't want to upgrade to Windows 8 and doesn't want to stick with Windows 7 will probably be looking at Macs, especially if they have iOS devices.
As for Linux, I think Steam for Linux will do more for desktop Linux adoption than Windows 8 ever will.