Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 00:39 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533727
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: piss poor design
by UltraZelda64 on Thu 6th Sep 2012 00:09
in reply to "RE[4]: piss poor design"
You don't get the idea that with every version of Windows that Microsoft is forced by the opposition to leave the desktop in, that Microsoft will make it increasingly difficult and just a massive pain in the ass to use the traditional desktop without throwing hurdles at you?
Seriously, come on--they've done such things already with Windows 8 in its development cycle, and the damn thing is not even released yet...
You don't get the idea that with every version of Windows that Microsoft is forced by the opposition to leave the desktop in, that Microsoft will make it increasingly difficult and just a massive pain in the ass to use the traditional desktop without throwing hurdles at you?
Yes, but I also get the idea that Metro is going to get better over time, and not the clusterf**k that it is now.




Member since:
2005-11-13
'As soon as they can' is the key here, and will probably be like in Windows 12
So, relax guys. You're not going to install Windows 9 and suddenly discover that the traditional desktop is gone, and it's all Metro. I think the point here is to try and get tech tards moved over, and then migrate the power users at a later time. And in the unlikely event that the traditional desktop does go away in Windows 9, it's going to go away whether I use it Windows 7 or Windows 8.
It's also possible that if Metro doesn't catch on with the computer illiterate, MS will abandon it, just like they have done with other technologies that they 'bet the company' on.
Edited 2012-09-03 23:31 UTC