Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Oct 2012 22:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538070
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: OEMs deserve to suffer
by kaiwai on Wed 10th Oct 2012 09:20
in reply to "RE[2]: OEMs deserve to suffer"
Sure, MS won't build low margin boxes. BUT they will build high margin premium devices.
Remember MS and Apple won't sue each other anymore, their patents are all basically shared.
For example: MS can easily add a magsafe power connector to surface and ship pinch-to-zoom or that magic trivial scrolling Apple has patented. Other OEMs .. not so much (besides Sony)
Remember MS and Apple won't sue each other anymore, their patents are all basically shared.
For example: MS can easily add a magsafe power connector to surface and ship pinch-to-zoom or that magic trivial scrolling Apple has patented. Other OEMs .. not so much (besides Sony)
There is a clause though with the patent sharing that doesn't allow 'blatant' copying so it isn't really an open and shut case.
RE[4]: OEMs deserve to suffer
by kragil on Wed 10th Oct 2012 12:00
in reply to "RE[3]: OEMs deserve to suffer"
BS, MS and Apple just need to make it look a little different and they are fine. See Surface Magsafe etc.
And even if they didn't: MS and Apple will not sue each other anymore .. those times are over PERIOD. They profit more from having insurmountable barriers (like stupid trivial software patents etc) for upcoming competitors.





Member since:
2006-01-04
Sure, MS won't build low margin boxes. BUT they will build high margin premium devices.
Remember MS and Apple won't sue each other anymore, their patents are all basically shared.
For example: MS can easily add a magsafe power connector to surface and ship pinch-to-zoom or that magic trivial scrolling Apple has patented. Other OEMs .. not so much (besides Sony)