Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Legal Previously redacted documents presented in the Apple-Samsung case do not support Apple's claims that Samsung issued a 'copy-the-iPhone'-order to its designers. It's pretty damning. Apple has very selectively and actively deleted sections of internal Samsung documents and talks to make it seem as if Samsung's designers were ordered to copy the iPhone. With the unredacted, full documents without Apple's deletions in hand, a completely different picture emerges: Samsung's designers are told to be as different and creative as possible. There's no 'copy the iPhone'-order anywhere, as Apple claimed. Instead, it says this: "designers rightly must make their own designs with conviction and confidence; do not strive to do designs to please me (the president); instead make designs with faces that are creative and diverse." I guess my initial scepticism about the documents was not uncalled for. What do you know - lawyers twist and turn the truth. Shocker, huh?
Thread beginning with comment 538147
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: lazy lazy lazy
by MOS6510 on Wed 10th Oct 2012 16:45 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: lazy lazy lazy"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

Well, join the club.

I'm not kidding that it shouldn't even be too difficult to make a Thom simulator as he has a number of discussion "tactics" he tends to use. It might be fun to put them on-line and number them.

I think he's a smart guy and thus he probably does understand you, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong. The value of this site would increase a lot if he stopped presenting personal believes and even wishes as facts.

Reply Parent Score: 1