Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 13:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539582
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If Apple has patents that competitors need in order to successfully compete, they can either pay what Apple asks or they can not compete. There is no law that requires they give access to other competitors so they can successfully compete with Apple.
*Successfully*, of course not.
But could try, I really think there is.
Otherwise, Apple could just ask $100 billions per unit for touchscreen patents and rule the touchscreen devices marketfield until the world's ending.
Touchscreen is presented as an unavoidable technology increasing the smartphone license rate in quite every slides here. It's clearly an attempt to raise 20% the enter price in hope that would make the Windows Phone 40% discount more interesting for Samsung.
The target in these slides is not Samsung.
It's Android. It's written everywhere : drop Android.
Without any proof that Android actually infring Apple patents beside the usual "it use our technologies".
No wonder Samsung don't buy it.
If Apple was not that hangry, asking for a $5-10 rate, maybe they would have.
Instead, they reject it and goes full straight. They may lost in suits, but they win far more in marketshare.




Member since:
2011-04-25
That is not the question at all, but it is at the center of many people here misunderstanding.
If Apple has patents that competitors need in order to successfully compete, they can either pay what Apple asks or they can not compete. There is no law that requires they give access to other competitors so they can successfully compete with Apple.