Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Nov 2012 23:16 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 540916
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by ssokolow
by moondevil on Sat 3rd Nov 2012 10:20
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow"
RE[5]: Comment by ssokolow
by Morgan on Sat 3rd Nov 2012 14:01
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by ssokolow"
RE[4]: Comment by ssokolow
by ssokolow on Sat 3rd Nov 2012 11:49
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow"
How would you say it compares to LXDE for performance and memory-consumption?
...because that's currently sort of my gold standard for what I want. I'm always looking for new functionality that streamlines my day (for example, I may replace Openbox with AwesomeWM or XMonad) but only if it doesn't increase the CPU or memory footprint disproportionate to what I gain.
(Among other reasons, because I run the same desktop on both my monster of a main machine and the 2Ghz Celeron with 1GiB of RAM that I use as a minimum target platform for my own creations)





Member since:
2012-08-01
You have to try it and see.
It's incredibly snappy, very smooth animations (integrated graphics intel gma965). Makes everything else look slow and overloaded.
Except, it's very simplistic. If you like that, then Enlightenment is worth the effort.