Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 02:24 UTC
Windows Microsoft is discontinuing Windows Live Messenger in 1st quarter 2013, forcing users to switch to Skype. Most would want to switch to Skype anyway with its more advanced capabilities, and the switch makes sense to Microsoft, since they purchased Skype for $8.5 billion last year. However, the move may be seen as typical Redmondian high-handedness by those using Messenger with dial-up. Technically Skype works with dial-up but in practice most agree you really need broadband for decent use. Will everyone view Messenger as replaceable by Skype?
Thread beginning with comment 541621
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Could it be fixed?
by ssokolow on Fri 9th Nov 2012 13:56 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Could it be fixed?"
Member since:

Then don't remove pulse audio.

If it actually worked, I wouldn't.

I don't know about you, but I really don't feel like babysitting my computer because, every time they claim to have fixed the "PulseAudio randomly starts consuming 100% of a CPU core" bug, nothing changes.

Also, it does nothing I need aside from locking my soundcard to only applications running in the current X session... and golly gosh isn't that a desired feature when it makes Timidity++ (I often play old Windows games in Wine) and system text-to-speech engines a pain to setup.

Every PulseAudio feature I actually care about is also done by ALSA dmix and dmix Just Works™ while being significantly lighter. (I have an old 2Ghz Celeron I keep around for minimum requirements testing on my own creations)

I think I'll probably just ditch Skype instead, bite the bullet, and spend a day or two figuring out how to get an open-source XMPP+Jingle VoIP client to interoperate with Google Talk. After all, all my friends are on that too.

Edited 2012-11-09 13:57 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3