Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 13th Nov 2012 06:13 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 542343
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by Neolander on Wed 14th Nov 2012 12:07
in reply to "RE: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Wow, now THAT's big news! There definitely should be an article about this on OSnews, if there hasn't been one already.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by WereCatf on Wed 14th Nov 2012 12:15
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Wow, now THAT's big news! There definitely should be an article about this on OSnews, if there hasn't been one already. "
I don't think most people here care. Just look at how little discussion this topic here has generated, and that link is only about the RPi -- an even smaller audience.
I'm somewhat disappointed, I was hoping for some interesting discussion here, or even just pointers to good Pandaboard-like devices with SATA and actually functional software.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by renox on Wed 14th Nov 2012 14:37
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Wow, now THAT's big news! "
That depends on your POV, the driver is just an 'RPC shim' to a companion CPU which runs the "real" driver, so
-from a maintenance POV this is useless
-from a licensing POV 100% of the code running on the ARM CPU is Free which is a big news indeed.
Member since:
2010-06-09
- http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221 -