To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nvidia buying AMD for the GFX part, ceasing AMD x86 line? (since the license is non-transferable*, and since Nv is focusing on their Project Denver ARM - where AMD CPU talent should come handy)
Now that would be some behemoth... and maybe even without many formal or legislative roadblocks?
*this x86-licensing thing is weird, though - apparently, Nvidia did sell x86 processors at some point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_x86_manufacturers#x86-processo...
The license can be market-specific, for example embedded only? ~i386-only?
Edited 2012-11-14 00:11 UTC
--The license can be market-specific, for example embedded only? ~i386-only?-- No
i386 is 1985 for the instruction set. Add 20 years. 2005 patents died on instruction set.
http://bbs.66club.cn/uc_home/space.php?uid=672797&do=blog&id=592924 The Same design as Nvidia x86 chip is still in production. Nvidia sold that design off to a different maker.
Embedded x86 mostly uses patent expired.





Member since:
2005-06-29
nobody in their right mind would go headon with intel,
I was actually thinking someone would want to buy them for the graphics hardware, and transition the CPU side to focus on mobile. That way they aren't directly competing with Intel (yet).
Stranger things have happened, but you're right, it probably wouldn't be Intel. At least, not without some interesting courtroom antics.
Edited 2012-11-13 23:24 UTC