Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542484
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I beg to differ, my netbook is quite handy with a dual core AMD Brazos processor.
The only ones with a proper OpenGL support for netbooks.
As someone that does graphics programming as hobby, I'll never own an Intel GPU, it is already enough to endure them on my work laptop.
The only ones with a proper OpenGL support for netbooks.
As someone that does graphics programming as hobby, I'll never own an Intel GPU, it is already enough to endure them on my work laptop.
Yup, I have heard similar praise of AMD's IGPs, but as far as I know they have also been late on the CPU front for a while now, both in terms of performance and power consumption, which is why there are almost no notebooks with AMD processors around nowadays.
When it comes to general usage, what does "late on the CPU front for a while now" even mean? Because CPUs have been more than powerful enough, in such usage, for a while now.
There are only really two home PC areas which can be still starved for power - gaming and video editing. In both, the GPU kinda matters more; so in both, AMD is the one with an edge, thanks to more capable integrated GPUs.





Member since:
2005-07-08
I beg to differ, my netbook is quite handy with a dual core AMD Brazos processor.
The only ones with a proper OpenGL support for netbooks.
As someone that does graphics programming as hobby, I'll never own an Intel GPU, it is already enough to endure them on my work laptop.