Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543800
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Sat 1st Dec 2012 08:39
in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510"
I couldn't wait and remote booted a XP PC at work. When I tried to install the patch it refused saying something new already had been installed.
The registry and boot things I could do. But it's hard to tell any change in performance when using some remote login tool. So I guess I still have to go there in person.
Removing McAfee would probably be a more noticeable performance boost!
RE[11]: Comment by MOS6510
by zima on Sat 1st Dec 2012 10:32
in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510"





Member since:
2005-07-06
Must try it on my dual Pentium II machine (should be similar with win2k). Or I'll just finally slap BeOS on it :p