Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545875
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-10-23
"Most dictatorships begin this way, and even to the end maintain a viewpoint that "the people just need guidance".
Can you support this claim? Because I don't think it's true. From what I can recall, most dictatorships have been established in sudden popular uprisings or military coups with the notable exception being Nazi Germany. The PRC, USSR, Iran (under the Shah), Iraq, etc. were all established as dictatorships without ever consulting the people. "
Interestingly most totalitarian dictatorships (concerned with every aspect of its peoples' lives, even thoughts) did begin with a popular uprising of some kind, or at least popular support, as with the Nazis. On the other hand most 'hands off' dictatorships (concerned only those aspects of their peoples' lives that directly effected the dictator/s power and wealth) tended to be started by elites, often by coups.
Not making a point relevant to the debate, just an observation. And no, I've nothing to back it up.