Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Feb 2013 13:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552338
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by Fergy on Wed 13th Feb 2013 18:09
in reply to "RE: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
Oh, At first I thought you were saying that the other browsers also abandoned their engines to focus on ui. But I understand you're saying that Opera will now just be like them, only doing ui.
Fair enough, however Opera has actually invented most of the modern web browser ui that I find useful (tabs, quick dial, etc). Its the engine that it usually fell short on. So I look forward to it being able to innovate without having to constantly fix their javascript support.
Fair enough, however Opera has actually invented most of the modern web browser ui that I find useful (tabs, quick dial, etc). Its the engine that it usually fell short on. So I look forward to it being able to innovate without having to constantly fix their javascript support.
Yeah sorry I could have been more clear. But I don't care about who was first. I care about who does it best. Opera is number 2 for me(Firefox is 1). Opera feels fast and reliable. The speed of Chrome with the nice Opera GUI would be an improvement on Chrome but a step backwards for Opera.
Edited 2013-02-13 18:10 UTC
RE[3]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by telns on Wed 13th Feb 2013 18:55
in reply to "RE[2]: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
RE[2]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by Phucked on Wed 13th Feb 2013 18:26
in reply to "RE: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
Fair enough, however Opera has actually invented most of the modern web browser ui that I find useful (tabs, quick dial, etc). Its the engine that it usually fell short on. So I look forward to it being able to innovate without having to constantly fix their javascript support.
The first web browser with Tabs was InternetWorks in 1994
RE[3]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by phoenix on Wed 13th Feb 2013 18:53
in reply to "RE[2]: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
RE[2]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by zima on Mon 18th Feb 2013 20:52
in reply to "RE: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
Its the engine that it usually fell short on. So I look forward to it being able to innovate without having to constantly fix their javascript support.
http://blog.chromium.org/2010/03/does-your-browser-behave.html ...perhaps the js compliance of Opera engine was just "too good" in an idealistic way.
Their engine has generally some good points, large part of why Opera is light on resources for example (most noticeable on older machines; also, this surely allowed them to host Opera Mini more easily - but maybe Webkit & present server hardware are now good enough for that)
Edited 2013-02-18 20:55 UTC





Member since:
2006-07-14
Oh, At first I thought you were saying that the other browsers also abandoned their engines to focus on ui. But I understand you're saying that Opera will now just be like them, only doing ui.
Fair enough, however Opera has actually invented most of the modern web browser ui that I find useful (tabs, quick dial, etc). Its the engine that it usually fell short on. So I look forward to it being able to innovate without having to constantly fix their javascript support.