Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Mar 2013 13:48 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless At TechCrunch, Jolla's CEO Marc Dillon explains why his company will focus on China, Finland, and the rest of Europe first, ignoring the US. "The US market is not on the radar as yet, as he says the patent landscape there 'raises a barrier' of entry to newcomers (he's especially critical of overly aggressive use of design patents)." Considering the patent mess in the US is only getting worse, expect to see more of this in the future. Jolla is making a wise decision by ignoring the US - as a young technology company, you're far better off focusing your attention elsewhere.
Thread beginning with comment 554152
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:
2006-07-14

I think the main difference between a low end symbian device and a low end android device is that a low end android device is an android device which is in some way a validation of their economic status through the advertising and general buzz. Functionally, I don't think there were many differences.

I don't have high hopes for Jolla. I think at some point Nokia is going to point at them and say "thats why we went with windows phone", which is really sad because it (sailfish/mer/meego) is a great operating system which never had a chance due to business reasons rather than technical ones.

Reply Parent Score: 2

zima Member since:
2005-07-06

it (sailfish/mer/meego) is a great operating system which never had a chance due to business reasons rather than technical ones.

Meego wasn't that great. It's what you hear from its (anti-new-Nokia) fanclub; it will be like Amiga worship...

OTOH: http://www.mobile-review.com/review/nokia-n9-2-en.shtml

PS. NVM functionality, Android handset is much more pleasant to use than a Symbian one. Which also often means you actually use its functionality more.

Edited 2013-03-10 23:50 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2