Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 10:35 UTC
Legal "Apple vs. Samsung initially ended with a billion-dollar verdict in favor of Apple, but there have been plenty of wrinkles since. This week brought about another, as Nokia filed an amicus brief on behalf of Apple, Inc. in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the brief filed Monday, Nokia asked the court to permit permanent injunctions on the sale of Samsung phones that were found to infringe Apple's patents." In the meantime, the latest comScore figures for the US show that Windows Phone's market share actually declined during the launch of Windows Phone 8. It's pretty clear that, combined with the disappointing quarterly results for Nokia, the company is setting itself up for the future. In this future, Nokia's patent portfolio is worth more than their actual phone business, and as such, Nokia can't do anything but support Apple in this case, else the value of their portfolio goes down.
Thread beginning with comment 554561
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
innovation halted by IP
by TechGeek on Thu 7th Mar 2013 22:29 UTC
Member since:


The largest example of an industry where innovation was halted by patents and IP was, surprise surprise, the phone industry. Bell was found to be a monopoly, having illegally domineered the entire industry, and was broken up. That allowed other phone companies like Sprint and MCI to exist.

Reply Score: 2

RE: innovation halted by IP
by Nelson on Thu 7th Mar 2013 22:51 in reply to "innovation halted by IP"
Nelson Member since:

That case wasn't really about patents.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: innovation halted by IP
by TechGeek on Fri 8th Mar 2013 02:02 in reply to "RE: innovation halted by IP"
TechGeek Member since:

Oh really. And just how do you think at&t became the huge corporation that got broken up? at&t had a long history of abuses all starting with the patent on the telephone.

Reply Parent Score: 1