Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC
Apple

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Thread beginning with comment 571944
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: wait
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 18:18 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: wait"
jared_wilkes
Member since:
2011-04-25

Based on the general meaning of RTFM (you asked a stupid question, the answer is provided if you just read correctly), votes on my comment, my subsequent comments, and the complete idiocy of the first post: YES!

Edited 2013-09-12 18:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: wait
by tylerdurden on Thu 12th Sep 2013 19:11 in reply to "RE[7]: wait"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

The original poster could be very well wrong, and probably is. But at this point your speculation is just as good as the person's you replied to, since neither of you have access to the official f--king manual, yet. All that is know is via non validated documents leaked a couple of days ago (or one day ago when you wrote your response).

So if you're going to flippantly tell other people to RTFM, you should perhaps apply that advice/standard to yourself first.

Edited 2013-09-12 19:22 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[9]: wait
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 20:08 in reply to "RE[8]: wait"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

Maybe you should rejoin reality. No one agrees with you. Everyone seems to unambiguously accept that Apple is being truthful in saying that the only place your fingerprint/authentication data will reside is locally on an iOS device equipped with Touch ID on a secure coprocessor of the SOC and that they will not transmit that data off of the device.

You can continue to claim that's not verified and that Apple may be lying, but you just sound like a nutjob.

Reply Parent Score: 2