Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th May 2017 15:41 UTC

So for today's AMD Financial Analyst Day, AMD has released a little bit more information as part of the next step of their campaign. The first Vega product to be released has a name, it has a design, and it has performance figures. Critically, it even has a release date. I hesitate to call this a full announcement in the typical sense - AMD is still holding some information back until closer to the launch - but we now finally have a clear picture of where the Vega generation kicks off for AMD.

Say hello to the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition.

First Ryzen, now Vega, with Ryzen 9 on the way. AMD is on a roll, and Intel is scrambling. Competition!

Thread beginning with comment 644441
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
AMD. NVidia, Intel ....
by cade on Fri 19th May 2017 00:39 UTC
Member since:

Intel is "CPU".
NVidia is "GPU"
AMD is "CPU + GPU".

It would be logical to infer that AMD would have the potential for a more flexible/broader product/technology strategy; i.e. there are reasons to believe that there can be a good "upside" to AMD.

While AMD bought ATI, Intel did not buy NVidia.
That must mean something good for AMD.

Reply Score: 1

RE: AMD. NVidia, Intel ....
by JLF65 on Fri 19th May 2017 15:30 in reply to "AMD. NVidia, Intel ...."
JLF65 Member since:

Intel makes CPU+GPU as well as just CPU. They've long had their own GPU line, which can't compete with either AMD (ATI), or nVidia, so they've kept it for their CPU+GPU mobile market chips.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: AMD. NVidia, Intel ....
by Kochise on Fri 19th May 2017 17:42 in reply to "RE: AMD. NVidia, Intel ...."
Kochise Member since:

No. They just sell regular computers with their GPU on the main board as well. Up to you to power you rig with a stronger horse if needed. Several business and office computers doesn't need much that Intel's HD graphics that also quite improved with time and are perfectly OpenGL 4 capable.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: AMD. NVidia, Intel ....
by cade on Sat 20th May 2017 00:43 in reply to "RE: AMD. NVidia, Intel ...."
cade Member since:

To clarify, and in agreement with your comment, I meant "GPU" to refer to the more powerful GPUs capable of decent gaming and good candidates for VR/AR (virtual/augmented reality) applications; part of my programming work is 3D game engine research/development and I implicitly assumed the powerful-GPU-context, not the low power GPUs useful for business/office/etc. graphics (the latter are still useful for many people of the non-{gamer, technical} variety).

Apple's OSX is my primary software development platform prior to potential porting to other operating systems and being a 3D graphics guy I was surprised why a multimedia-centric company like Apple would shove a non-performant oriented GPU (Intel rather than NVidia/AMD) in the mac-mini. Even make the mac-min abit fatter for cooling of a decent GPU. I say this since a mac-mini "weaponised" with a real/powerful GPU (at least supporting OpenGL 4.0) would be a convenient software development box for us "graphics" dudes.

I hope that AMD's CPU/GPU stance, with possible side-effect being pressure on Intel/NVidia, may lead to Apple having easy access to options about a more functional mac-mini, etc.

My theory is that Apple will have to realise that, in a philosophical/creative sense, selling iPhones as their main product is not enough even though it's their "cash cow" since Apple may risk being confused as primarily a seller of mobile phones. Thus it will have to go back to it's roots and start to frequently refresh it's computer product lines; e.g. a modular/fatter mac mini useful for pro/consumer usage.

Let's wait and see.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: AMD. NVidia, Intel ....
by cb88 on Mon 22nd May 2017 13:26 in reply to "RE: AMD. NVidia, Intel ...."
cb88 Member since:

That isn't accurate... Intel GPUs power tons of low end desktops ie (what your grandparents, 50+% of business users and just about all kiosks will be running).... the win the lions share of GPU sales just because they sold a CPU + any GPU at all.

Reply Parent Score: 2