Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Sep 2017 10:16 UTC

Ars Technica:

The spec sheet, as announced, is still pretty vague, but Atari has confirmed a few notable things, starting with a price point between $250 and $300. In exchange for costing roughly as much as a Nintendo Switch, Xbox One S, or PlayStation 4, the Ataribox will come packed with an "AMD customized processor with Radeon graphics technology." Additionally, this will not be an Android system. Instead, the Ataribox will run Linux "with a customized, easy-to-use user interface."

Open, hackable Linux-based consoles don't exactly have a great track record, so colour me skeptical.

Wouldn't be the first time my skepticism turns out to be spot-on. I don't think the Ataribox is the next Commodore USA, but I'm afraid its fate will be the same, regardless.

Thread beginning with comment 649386
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Sat 30th Sep 2017 07:17 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer"
Member since:

Atari had a huge hit with the 2600. Coleco was on their heels with a better system, better games, and the benefit of good arcade ports. Atari's answer, the 5200, didn't measure up. Coleco in it's first year sold 2 million units. The 5200 only sold half that in twice the time. In addition, Intellivision also stomped on Atari, doing even better than Coleco. This happened *before* the NES and the 7800.

Fantasizing about an alternate history doesn't change the reality of the real one. In this case being the first to break into a market on a large scale doesn't mean you were the best. It means you were the first. Acknowledging that fact doesn't mean you're a fan, it means you're aware of the truth. I lived through this era, I owned all of these systems, and remember exactly what it was like.

Reply Parent Score: 3