Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Nov 2017 11:50 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes

Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of MINIX, has published an open letter to Intel regarding Intel's use of MINIX in the IME:

The only thing that would have been nice is that after the project had been finished and the chip deployed, that someone from Intel would have told me, just as a courtesy, that MINIX 3 was now probably the most widely used operating system in the world on x86 computers. That certainly wasn't required in any way, but I think it would have been polite to give me a heads up, that's all.

If nothing else, this bit of news reaffirms my view that the Berkeley license provides the maximum amount of freedom to potential users. If they want to publicize what they have done, fine. By all means, do so. If there are good reasons not to release the modified code, that's fine with me, too.

I can still barely believe this whole story.

Thread beginning with comment 650647
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: freedom
by sj87 on Tue 7th Nov 2017 15:57 UTC in reply to "RE: freedom"
Member since:

And? One of the biggest problems with the GPL is that it requires source code changes to be published. And it tends to "infect" projects that rely on other projects licensed under the GPL.

They wouldn't be proprietary if they were licensed under GPL... In most cases, however, the reason seems to be general hostility towards openness and fair play. It is hard to imagine e.g. generic printer drivers would expose any kind of trade secrets.

Reply Parent Score: 3