To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The outcry is because they're doing the bare minimum to keep a customer who really ought to leave....
The outcry is because after snickering at open document standards and refusing to implement one they're "embracing" them by publishing their own. It's very fishy, and consumers should be aware.
Not again sappy... this is so obvious this time.
Look at it. Microsoft is playing dirty in order to extinguish all kind of competition, so Office XML can be the one to bind us all, the one to rule us all.
Microsoft has NOT taken any steps to make Office XML an open standard. They have taken steps to make Office XML an openly documented closed proprietary and patent encumbered standard. Most ECMA standards are encumbered by patents, so they are basically no good in the end.
You've claimed you're not automagically supportive of Microsoft, but you always protect them, no matter how unethical they are.
What do you think on the character assasination of Peter Quinn committed by Boston Globe and Microsoft? Isn't that one unethical?




Member since:
2005-07-06
Um.. I never even implied they're a champion of consumer rights. In fact, this has little to do with consumer rights.
The fact is, Microsoft is taking action and making progress towards satisfying the requirements put forth by the Massachusettes government for an open standard. If Microsoft does end up meeting these requirements, and Mass. stays with Microsoft, why the outcry?