Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Nov 2005 18:48 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight
Features, Office In a reversal, the state government of Massachusetts has thrown its support to Microsoft in an ongoing battle over office software formats and has launched an investigation into the state's former IT chief, who had been championing open-source software. "The Commonwealth is very pleased with Microsoft's progress in creating an open document format," said the state's Administration and Finance Secretary Tom Trimarco in a short statement on Thanksgiving eve. "If Microsoft follows through as planned, we are optimistic that Office Open XML will meet our new standards for acceptable open formats."
Thread beginning with comment 66792
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sappyvcv
Member since:
2005-07-06

Um.. I never even implied they're a champion of consumer rights. In fact, this has little to do with consumer rights.

The fact is, Microsoft is taking action and making progress towards satisfying the requirements put forth by the Massachusettes government for an open standard. If Microsoft does end up meeting these requirements, and Mass. stays with Microsoft, why the outcry?

Reply Parent Score: 1

ma_d Member since:
2005-06-29

The outcry is because they're doing the bare minimum to keep a customer who really ought to leave....

The outcry is because after snickering at open document standards and refusing to implement one they're "embracing" them by publishing their own. It's very fishy, and consumers should be aware.

Reply Parent Score: 1

dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Not again sappy... this is so obvious this time.

Look at it. Microsoft is playing dirty in order to extinguish all kind of competition, so Office XML can be the one to bind us all, the one to rule us all.

Microsoft has NOT taken any steps to make Office XML an open standard. They have taken steps to make Office XML an openly documented closed proprietary and patent encumbered standard. Most ECMA standards are encumbered by patents, so they are basically no good in the end.

You've claimed you're not automagically supportive of Microsoft, but you always protect them, no matter how unethical they are.

What do you think on the character assasination of Peter Quinn committed by Boston Globe and Microsoft? Isn't that one unethical?

Reply Parent Score: 0