To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"without that I'm pretty sure it is illegal."
It can't be illegal.
The terms in EULAs might want you to believe that it is, and they might want to place all sorts of restricitions on people ... does not mean that they actually have the right to try to impose such restrictions.
If I use a codec (for example for .mov or .rm) that is an exact binary copy of a codec offered by Apple or RealMedia for free to Windows users, then they have no legal grounds whatsoever for not offering those exact same files for use by people running Linux.
If, for example, I download such a codec with Windows and for my Windows system, then what imaginable rule could possibly stop me from pointing to that exact same disk location instructing my Linux media player (on a dual-boot machine) to look there for codecs?




Member since:
2005-07-13
The files (dll,ocx) are part of a *product* WindowsXP. To use them you *have to* accept a license (which obviously cost money:)) without that I'm pretty sure it is illegal.
MS released *open-source* licenses which specifically DISALLOW using the source code on any other platform than windows. This does not cover the codecs but it is a example of what a license can enforce.
It is not like MS has these codecs on their site with a big banner free download, they are copied (stolen in RIAA jargon) from someones (probably even cracked) windows version.
Edited 2006-01-10 13:19