Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 97732
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Was just going to quote from the same post to note that, as usual, the devs tell a different tale: not a RedHat vs. Novell all-out war, but a competition with cooperation typical of open source development.
Folks, can we stop seeing it either black or white? This is free software we're talking about, the (comparative) waste of resources is more than compensated by the fact that choice is good, that different paths can be tested and tried, and that good code doesn't get wasted anyway, as the example above shows.
Enough with silly flamewars.
rehdon




Member since:
2005-06-29
Some quotes from Christopher Blizzard's post [1] :
"However, there’s been a huge number of external contributions to the aiglx work from outside of Red Hat and one of the primary components of aiglx (the pixmap to texture extension) actually comes from the XGL! It’s just where it’s integrated that’s important. At worst, it’s a competition, at best, it’s inadvertent teamwork."
"Because that’s where the real value is in compiz - not the window management capabilities, but the great 3D effects it has. It would be great if we could get the best of both worlds and deliver a unified solution."
Just take a look in the entire post. There's some usefull info from this dev's point of view.
[1] http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/?p=178