64 cores of rendering madness: the AMD Threadripper Pro 3995WX review

In the tests that matter, most noticeably the 3D rendering tests, we’re seeing a 3% speed-up on the Threadripper Pro compared to the regular Threadripper at the same memory frequency and sub-timings. The core frequencies were preferential on the 3990X, but the memory bandwidth of the 3995WX is obviously helping to a small degree, enough to pull ahead in our testing, along with the benefit of having access to 8x of the memory capacity as well as Pro features for proper enterprise-level administration.

The downside of this comparison is the cost: the SEP difference is +$1500, or another 50%, for the Threadripper Pro 3995WX over the regular Threadripper 3990X. With this price increase, you’re not really paying +50% for the performance difference (ECC memory also costs a good amount), but the feature set. Threadripper Pro is aimed at the visual effects and rendering market, where holding 3D models in main memory is a key aspect of workflow speed as well as full-scene production. Alongside the memory capacity difference, having double the PCIe 4.0 lanes means more access to offload hardware or additional fast storage, also important tools in the visual effects space. Threadripper Pro falls very much into the bucket of ‘if you need it, this is the option to go for‘.

AMD is entirely in a league of its own with these processors. I keep repeating it, but AMD’s comeback is one of the most remarkable stories in the history of technology.


  1. 2021-02-10 8:43 pm
    • 2021-02-11 8:19 am
      • 2021-02-11 3:16 pm
      • 2021-02-17 12:19 am
        • 2021-02-17 12:59 am
          • 2021-02-18 3:08 am
    • 2021-02-11 3:24 pm
      • 2021-02-11 5:09 pm
        • 2021-02-11 10:57 pm
          • 2021-02-17 1:03 am
        • 2021-02-11 11:07 pm
        • 2021-02-21 8:01 am
  2. 2021-02-11 12:14 am
    • 2021-02-11 5:36 am
      • 2021-02-11 6:53 am
      • 2021-02-11 3:08 pm
      • 2021-02-11 5:40 pm