Who Will Get Blessed with IE9 in the End?

Microsoft has “set up and removed” having Windows 7 Service Pack 1 as a prerequisite to running (or, more correctly, “installing”) IE9, in the space of just 2 days.

I came across the linked article while reading the Homegroup article linked in a previous news item and thought it was worth sharing, not that I care about Internet Explorer. But I am shocked that a dumb browser would have such a high OS requirement. I can understand Microsoft wishing all Windows users move to Windows 7. This is still no justification for imposing this restriction.

Why? Because other browsers (looking at Chrome, Firefox, Opera, maybe all of the others) won’t be lagging far behind (my original wording was “will still be better”, which is an unsupported claim as I haven’t got a crystal ball yet) because of not needing 7 SP 1.

What is so magical about IE9 that it has such a demand? Or will it be, paraphrasing another slogan, a “revolution in browsing”? If I am not mistaken, had they not changed their mind, having a “trivial” software package such as a browser impose an OS restriction with such a short compatibility time span, would have been unheard of. Someone correct me please.

I am wondering how the Windows market share is divided among XP, Vista and 7. Unless the figures show an undeniable tide towards the latter, for a browser with (I can only guess) the aim of reconquering some browser market shares, Microsoft wasn’t making the best move. Good thing, for them and for the IE9 users, that someone sensible reverted that not-so-obviously-brilliant idea. Of course, that’s until the reverting is undone.

Don’t software companies have PR people dedicated to managing/taking care of/dealing with/protecting their image?

32 Comments

  1. google_ninja 2010-09-27 1:48 pm EST
    • chandler 2010-09-27 1:55 pm EST
      • google_ninja 2010-09-27 1:58 pm EST
        • vaette 2010-09-27 2:24 pm EST
    • Kroc 2010-09-27 4:37 pm EST
      • google_ninja 2010-09-27 5:04 pm EST
    • Brunis 2010-09-28 10:35 am EST
  2. chandler 2010-09-27 1:54 pm EST
    • Fettarme H-Milch 2010-09-27 8:53 pm EST
      • umccullough 2010-09-27 9:10 pm EST
        • Fettarme H-Milch 2010-09-28 12:36 am EST
      • Delgarde 2010-09-27 9:15 pm EST
        • Fettarme H-Milch 2010-09-28 12:33 am EST
  3. Shannara 2010-09-27 2:36 pm EST
  4. another_sam 2010-09-27 3:10 pm EST
    • nt_jerkface 2010-09-27 3:30 pm EST
  5. nt_jerkface 2010-09-27 3:21 pm EST
    • Stratoukos 2010-09-27 5:42 pm EST
  6. Jason Bourne 2010-09-27 4:11 pm EST
  7. himanshu 2010-09-27 4:40 pm EST
    • WarpKat 2010-09-27 4:54 pm EST
    • nt_jerkface 2010-09-27 7:07 pm EST
      • lemur2 2010-09-27 10:54 pm EST
        • nt_jerkface 2010-09-27 11:48 pm EST
          • lemur2 2010-09-28 1:25 am EST
          • nt_jerkface 2010-09-28 3:23 am EST
          • lemur2 2010-09-28 5:04 am EST
          • nt_jerkface 2010-09-28 10:11 pm EST
    • Fettarme H-Milch 2010-09-27 8:54 pm EST
  8. ramasubbu_sk 2010-09-27 9:42 pm EST
  9. SterlingNorth 2010-09-28 8:32 am EST
  10. _QJ_ 2010-09-28 7:59 pm EST