Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Dec 2017 23:04 UTC
Apple

Mark Gurman:

Starting as early as next year, software developers will be able to design a single application that works with a touchscreen or mouse and trackpad depending on whether it's running on the iPhone and iPad operating system or on Mac hardware, according to people familiar with the matter.

Developers currently must design two different apps - one for iOS, the operating system of Apple's mobile devices, and one for macOS, the system that runs Macs. That's a lot more work. What's more, Apple customers have long complained that some Mac apps get short shrift. For example, while the iPhone and iPad Twitter app is regularly updated with the social network's latest features, the Mac version hasn't been refreshed recently and is widely considered substandard. With a single app for all machines, Mac, iPad and iPhone users will get new features and updates at the same time.

Apple currently plans to begin rolling out the change as part of next fall's major iOS and macOS updates, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss an internal matter. The secret project, codenamed "Marzipan", is one of the tentpole additions for next year's Apple software road map. Theoretically, the plan could be announced as early as the summer at the company's annual developers conference if the late 2018 release plan remains on track. Apple's plans are still fluid, the people said, so the implementation could change or the project could still be canceled.

This is a massive change in Apple's direction. The company and its supporters have always held fast to the concept that there should be two distinct and different operating systems with two distinct and different user interfaces, very much the opposite of what Microsoft is still trying to do with Windows Metro applications and their Surface line-up. This change is basically a complete embrace of Microsoft's vision for the future of computing.

This will have tremendous consequences for both iOS and macOS. For iOS, it probably means we get more advanced, fuller-featured applications, and I think this also pretty much confirms we're going to see a mouse pointer and trackpad/mouse support on iOS in the very near future - just as I predicted earlier this year. For macOS, it might mean a broader base of applications to choose from, but also possibly a dumbing-down of existing applications. A number of Apple applications already work very much like the article states, and they certainly lost functionality on the macOS side of things.

On the more speculative side, this could be the next step in deprecating macOS, which is, in my unfounded opinion, still Apple's ultimate goal here. Note how Apple isn't bringing macOS applications to iOS, but vice versa. Make of that what you will, but I wouldn't have too much faith in the long term viability of macOS as a platform distinct and separate from iOS.

Thread beginning with comment 652381
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: This never works.
by Alfman on Mon 25th Dec 2017 05:31 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: This never works."
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

zima,

What's with the US insistance on using checks (I think I saw one last time in the 1990s, never used them myself), why can't you just make transfers to account numbers? (say, from bank website)


Actually I'm not entirely sure, it may be due to legal reasons and fees. Most employees get paid through "direct deposit", which at least in the past could take a couple weeks to set up, in the meantime you'd get checks. I've never been paid any other way. There are lots of proprietary services, like paypal, but they can be notorious for high fees and blocking access to funds, ugh. One client wanted to pay me through paypal, but I would have needed to set up an account and pay a high percentage of the transaction costs, so I told him I'd accept it if I could raise my rate by the same amount as I'd be loosing...so he paid by check, haha. Most businesses generally pay with checks since US banks don't get a "cut". It might have to do with strict legal protections that were on the books and haven't been touched in eons.

How does it work for you guys?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: This never works.
by bluechimp on Mon 25th Dec 2017 21:39 in reply to "RE[4]: This never works."
bluechimp Member since:
2017-12-25

Well, within the EU we have SEPA transfer nowadays. This means the sender just enters the receiver's (long-ish) account number (and possibly the bank code for accounts in a different country). Money must arrive on the next business day (most of my banks transfer the money within 2-4h during work hours).

Transfer is usually free for individuals and only costs very little (10-30ยข per transaction, fixed cost, no percentage) for business accounts (corporate customers can negotiate individual rates).

This also works for deductions if your bank activated that feature on your account (usually this is only allowed for business accounts and they do some additional vetting). If you don't agree with a deduction you can force a return (even weeks/months later) via the web banking (initiator usually has to pay an additional fee to his bank so there is very little fraud).

The good part is also that this transferral system is regulated under somewhat strict banking licenses. So a bank can not just freeze your account (like Paypal). Courts and official oversight committees are pretty quick to get a bank in line if they have not *really* good reason for doing so.

Still, paypal is a often used for online shopping because it is so simple to use (and of course for transferrals outside of the SEPA area).

Reply Parent Score: 1