Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Jan 2007 13:34 UTC, submitted by Tomasz Dominikowski
Thread beginning with comment 202476
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: backwards compatibility
by Darkness on Wed 17th Jan 2007 01:00
in reply to "RE: backwards compatibility"





Member since:
2005-07-08
For example Linux, why do they keep supporting the old open sound system? Dump it, allow only alsa in the next release and force devs finally to update their software to make use of the new/improved features.
Because ALSA is Linux-only, but OSS support is widely available. Until you get ALSA working on BSDs and numerous other Unix systems with OSS support, supporting *only* OSS leads to Linux lock-in. GNOME and KDE run on Unix-like systems, not on Linux, and such lock-in would be hard to sell.