Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 29th Dec 2007 21:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 293704
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2007-02-17
In four years of trying, SCOG came up with not one shred of evidence of infringement in Linux. Not a single line.
In Germany, where the rules are different, SCOG were ordered either to come up with some actual evidence, or cease and desist with any accusations of infringement. SCOG chose the latter.
SCOG provided no evidence because there is none. There is no infringement of any kind in Linux. In fact it was revealed (by an old email) that an internal investigation by SCOG itself found exactly that.
That is the abundantly clear outcome from the case.