Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Jan 2008 20:35 UTC, submitted by koki
Thread beginning with comment 294295
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
Thanks for the adult tone Pacmania. Haiku has become fairly stable in the last year, thanks. And I don't see the problem of it being a clone of an 8 year old OS.
1) BeOS was ahead of its time.
2) Consider that the major new features in that time have been metadata searching, which was in BeOS, and graphics compositing, which isn't vital.
3) Haiku is not an exact clone. It contains important features that were never in R5.
In 2000/2001, OS X wasn't ready for mass-market. New Macs booted into OS 9!
Linux certainly wasn't ready for the same users that BeOS would be suitable for.
Windows has seen XP and Vista in that time. Solid releases, but not outstanding, and I'd happily use Windows 2000 today.
The big area lacking is multi-user support. That will be a deal breaker for many, and won't happen till R2. Otherwise there's a fabulous new OS around the corner, so what are you moaning about!?
Chris
Edited 2008-01-05 00:15