Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 4th Dec 2008 18:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 339360
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: From iTunes to Songbird (and waiting for Amarok!
by ichi on Tue 9th Dec 2008 15:01
in reply to "RE: From iTunes to Songbird (and waiting for Amarok!)"
Amarok's a decent media player ... but it's a horrible media manager. The "collection" is nothing more than a directory browser. You can't even edit any metadata (id tags, filename, etc) from within it.
Right click->Edit information for X tracks?
Maybe it could have been implented so you could edit that inside the very collection tree, but I don't see how that could have been done without adding clutter to the interface.
More so when, as it is right now, edit information doesn't just mean id tags but also lyrics and labels.
RE[3]: From iTunes to Songbird (and waiting for Amarok!
by phoenix on Tue 9th Dec 2008 16:15
in reply to "RE[2]: From iTunes to Songbird (and waiting for Amarok!"
Right click->Edit information for X tracks?
Maybe it could have been implented so you could edit that inside the very collection tree, but I don't see how that could have been done without adding clutter to the interface.
Maybe it could have been implented so you could edit that inside the very collection tree, but I don't see how that could have been done without adding clutter to the interface.
What really irks me about the interface is that the playlist is the centre of everything, instead of the collection. A playlist is a temporary thing, it changes constantly, and is only ever looked at while creating it or changing tracks. Why is that the centrepiece of the app?
If they swapped the "Collection" tree with the playlist, making the collection the centre of everything, then it would be simple to make the list editable. Just like any other file listing in Konq/Dolphin. No clutter required.
Then, the playlist is just a little thing off to the side, where it belongs.




Member since:
2005-07-11
This is something that I don't understand about a bunch of different "media managers". I don't want to create a new directory tree that is my collection. I already have that. And I especially don't want the different users on my home system to have their own separate directory trees with copies of the same music files in them. That's why we have a central file server at home.
I just want a media manager that will look at a directory tree, import the metadata about the files in there, and let me create a library based on those files. BUT DON'T MOVE/COPY THE FILES!! Why is that so hard for media manager developers to figure out?
Amarok's a decent media player ... but it's a horrible media manager. The "collection" is nothing more than a directory browser. You can't even edit any metadata (id tags, filename, etc) from within it.
If Songbird gets ports to FreeBSD as a native app, I may look at it. I'm running out of alternatives (GTK, and especially GNOME, apps are not alternatives.)