Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Feb 2010 22:55 UTC
Microsoft Sometimes, the sheer size of a company like Microsoft can make it quite hard to see and realise just how large and profitable such a company can really be. In these kinds of situations, there's nothing like a clear graph to make all those pretty numbers tangible. Up to a point.
Thread beginning with comment 409189
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by Kroc on Sat 13th Feb 2010 15:53 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
Member since:

I think you are so used to clueless customers that you don't see the people that manage to do quite a bit on Windows with limited interest they have in tech, but also without needing professional support.

I see plenty of those too. They do very well for themselves, and I should have worded my post to say "geeks, power users and prosumers". Windows does work for these people, those that are interested enough to make it work, but that’s not the majority unfortunately.

First of all the Ipad is not a primary device. It cannot update itself, you need Itunes for that.

This is the single biggest flaw with the iPad (that it cannot easily be your one and only computer). I think that if it gets popular enough, Apple will realise that the iPad needs to operate independently. Also I hope there will be good competition in this area in the form of ChromeOS / Android and others.

If the iPad / ChromeOS become popular enough the printer manufacturers will be forced into doing things in a standard way. Google are trying to force this with ChromeOS by asking manufacturers to supply a standard protocol and CUPS drivers and no more of that .MSI crap.

Apple badly need the competition to get them to open up the device and let it function with anybody’s equipment and no more "Made for iPad" restrictions.

edit: s/baldy/badly

Edited 2010-02-13 15:59 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Comment by Kroc
by Tuishimi on Sat 13th Feb 2010 17:03 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Kroc"
Tuishimi Member since:

I thought the baldy was a Freudian slip.

I sat here reading your post thinking "but I am here with my netbook, running Windows 7, Java and JBOSS so I can do development work while I travel..." before realizing DOH! I am one of those power users.

I definitely think there will be a "split" in computing. PCs and even laptops relegated to business and gaming use, then all kinds of internet "devices" for the people who make use of email, social web sites, etc.

I guess this means lower production and higher prices for the old guard equipment... and competitive pricing and larger quantities of the 3G/4G generation of devices.

Better build my gaming/development power house at home up while I can afford it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by Kroc
by Kroc on Sat 13th Feb 2010 17:42 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Kroc"
Kroc Member since:

I agree. It’s going to be in the ten to twenty year timespan, but it could be workstations for developers, and tablets and other devices for consumers. It depends on whether we come up with a new programming paradigm to suit programming on a multi-touch device (Bring back HyperCard! ;) )

Reply Parent Score: 1