Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Feb 2010 13:12 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Multimedia, AV The debate about HTML5 video is for the most part pretty straightforward: we all want HTML5 video, and we all recognise it's a better approach than Flash for online video. However, there's one thing we just can't seem to agree on: the codec. A number of benchmarks have been conducted recently, and they highlight the complexity of video encoding: they go either way.
Thread beginning with comment 411311
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Bad comparison
by darknexus on Sat 27th Feb 2010 04:31 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Bad comparison"
Member since:

Well, mandating it or another open codec for HTML 5 could very well qualify as that "something drastic."

Reply Parent Score: 2