"A new report suggests that Apple may be planning to eliminate retail boxed software from its Apple Stores, instead focusing on promoting the Mac App Store for software sales. This is indeed a trend that Apple has been pushing for a while, but not all the software that Apple sells would necessarily be a great fit for pure digital distribution."
Thread beginning with comment 461608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As a shop owner, I have the right to stock and sell the products I believe are of good quality, and that are something I feel my customers will demand. Basic economics and supply and demand, folks. Just because a product is made, that does not mean that I HAVE to sell it. And if I have some moral or philosophical objection to a product, I can refuse to sell that product in my store if I want as well. That is a basic right of the marketplace, and one that Apple is exercising in its own iOS App Store, and its OS X App Store, and I have absolutely no problem with that. It's their store and it is their right.
Their store is not the only place I can buy software for my computer, there are plenty of other places to do that, either online or a physical loation. And they have said NOTHING about preventing any other means of installing software on Apple computers, so anything about that subject is absolutely PURE speculation.
Their App Store IS the only place I can buy software for my iPhone, but in that instance they are dealing with another business (AT&T or Verizon), that also has restrictions on what can be put on the phones they sell in a desire to maintain a guaranteed user experience on their system. Jailbreaking destroys that guaranteed experience, and anyone who complains to AT&T, Verizon, or Apple if some software bricks their phone is just "up the creek" in my book because they themselves broke the experience on a product by not using it as it was intended or designed.
Back to my shop analogy, if I refuse to sell Playboy or some homophobic rap music because I don't personally like it, that is fine, there is no law that says that I must sell those or any product in my store. If I feel a product might be defective or harmful to my customers in ANY way, I don't have to sell that product in my store. Apple is doing the same thing; they evidently have a desire to protect the "customer experience" they are trying to build, and that is perfectly legal and I personally applaud them for it.
At an event earlier today, Microsoft unveiled the next Xbox - the third model, but confusingly named Xbox One. The big focus was TV, integrated Kinect, and all the other stuff we all expected to be forced down our throats. I think it took them 25 minutes to actually come to what should be the core of the story: gaming. Nothing groundbreaking in the gaming department, except for how Microsoft intends to handle the used games market and borrowing games from friends: pay up, buddy!
The day has finally come! Jolla has finally announced the launch device for its Sailfish operating system - and by god this is a looker. It's decidedly different from other phones out there, but it has good specifications and carries a relatively reasonably price tag - EUR 399, and it's up for pre-order today, shipping in the fourth quarter of this year.
Why does Google get so much credit in the technology industry? Why, despite the company's many obvious failings, do many geeks and enthusiasts still hold a somewhat positive view on the all-knowing technology giant? A specific talk at Google I/O this week provides the answer.
OSNews is a sponsor of this year's O'Reilly OSCON in Portland, Oregon, USA. A lucky OSNews reader will win a free three-day pass, including two tutorials days. To win the pass, post a comment on this story saying something about Open Source Software or OSCON. We'll pick a winner at random next week. If you don't have an OSNews account, you may email us your entry. Part of the conference is the 9th annual Open Source Awards, and today the 16th is the deadline for nominations. If you'd like to nominate an outstanding open source contributor, do it here. Read on for more information about OSCON. Update: The 20% discount code for OSNews readers is "OSN."
"Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
This is one of those news items that's fun to write, fun to read, fun to comment on, and where no one will be able to say anything unkind. It's all just one big ball of awesome fluffiness. TuneTracker, the BeOS radio automation software, has just released something very special: TuneTracker System 5, the first version designed entirely and specifically for Haiku. In fact, it actually includes Haiku in the software package. Better yet, TuneTracker also unveiled several system-in-a-box products - which have Haiku and TuneTracker pre-installed.
Exactly twenty years ago, a document was published that played a huge role in establishing the web as we know it today. Twenty years later, and this simple and straightforward document is proof of an irrefutable fact: while closed technologies can change markets, open technologies can change the world.
Oh multitasking. That staple of computing that got thrown out the window with many modern smartphones. We got some rudimentary thing in its place - but even as multitasking on phone and tablets improves, its user-visible side remains cumbersome. Windows 8 has a neat implementation, and now it's time Android follows in it footsteps.
They're here! Whether that excites you or not remains to be seen, but the Galaxy S4, which will most likely become the best selling Android smartphone of the year by a huge margin, has been reviewed by all the major sites, and there's lots of interesting conclusions in there - although I think most of you will get the gist.
Nokia has posted its quarterly results for the first quarter of 2013, and just like the quarters that came before, there's not a whole lot of good news in there. The rise in Lumia sales still can't even dream of making up for the sales drop in Symbian phones, and when broken down in versions, the sales figures for Windows Phone 8 Lumias in particular are very disappointing. In North America, Nokia is getting slaughtered.
Member since:
2006-06-01
As a shop owner, I have the right to stock and sell the products I believe are of good quality, and that are something I feel my customers will demand. Basic economics and supply and demand, folks. Just because a product is made, that does not mean that I HAVE to sell it. And if I have some moral or philosophical objection to a product, I can refuse to sell that product in my store if I want as well. That is a basic right of the marketplace, and one that Apple is exercising in its own iOS App Store, and its OS X App Store, and I have absolutely no problem with that. It's their store and it is their right.
Their store is not the only place I can buy software for my computer, there are plenty of other places to do that, either online or a physical loation. And they have said NOTHING about preventing any other means of installing software on Apple computers, so anything about that subject is absolutely PURE speculation.
Their App Store IS the only place I can buy software for my iPhone, but in that instance they are dealing with another business (AT&T or Verizon), that also has restrictions on what can be put on the phones they sell in a desire to maintain a guaranteed user experience on their system. Jailbreaking destroys that guaranteed experience, and anyone who complains to AT&T, Verizon, or Apple if some software bricks their phone is just "up the creek" in my book because they themselves broke the experience on a product by not using it as it was intended or designed.
Back to my shop analogy, if I refuse to sell Playboy or some homophobic rap music because I don't personally like it, that is fine, there is no law that says that I must sell those or any product in my store. If I feel a product might be defective or harmful to my customers in ANY way, I don't have to sell that product in my store. Apple is doing the same thing; they evidently have a desire to protect the "customer experience" they are trying to build, and that is perfectly legal and I personally applaud them for it.