Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 15:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 490495
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Mozilla: http://paulrouget.com/e/openness/
Fantastic. You're comparing Google to Mozilla. Bravo.
Clue: they provide vastly different services (the only overlap is Chrome, which is based on Chromium, that Google provides as open source software). Google provides the only viable non-encumbered video codec. Or where is Mozilla's mapping software? Telephony? Email service. Picasa? Video sharing site? Social network? I could mention countless others. Now some of these are ad supported (and some completely ad free, supported by ad revenue indirectly). How do you propose Google provided all this essentially free services? By taking donations? Lol. A small project like Mozilla can survive on a different model than Google's, but come one, how can you compare the two?
RE[4]: Comment by Kroc
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:15
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Kroc"
Which major tech company is more interested in an open and fair Internet?
That's the question that was asked. Its not fair to automatically assume that Mozilla is excluded from that group, just because it runs against your argument.
Its quite childish to ask an open question with an then start dismissing the obvious answers to the question by introducing new conditions on the question.
"Mozilla: http://paulrouget.com/e/openness/
Fantastic. You're comparing Google to Mozilla. Bravo.
Clue: they provide vastly different services (the only overlap is Chrome, which is based on Chromium, that Google provides as open source software) "
Congratulation, you missed that the article talks about Chrome being bundled and nothing else. That's right. Blind much. Very. Very. Much.





Member since:
2005-11-10
Mozilla: http://paulrouget.com/e/openness/