Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519838
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
I'm not inherently against the premise that governments can take action against gender inequality issues, but I also think that job quotas and special funding won't help much.
When you already have a huge asymmetry between men and women at the college education level, it is logical that less women will get "men jobs" in the end. IMO, the right answer is to fight the preconceived ideas that cause this asymmetry earlier in boys' and girls' education.
Acting after that will only cause capable job applicants to be let down in favor of less capable ones on purely sexist grounds, and thus resentment from those who have to face the consequences.
Edited 2012-05-29 08:45 UTC